Request for reviews (XS): 6879362
Vladimir.Kozlov at Sun.COM
Tue Sep 15 18:04:33 PDT 2009
Yes, the equals check could be removed now.
Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> Doesn't !is_subtype_of imply !equals?
> On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Fixed 6879362: assert(!klass_is_exact(),"only non-exact klass")
>> The AddP type could be not related to the type of
>> allocated object when CHA type is different from MDO type
>> on a dead path (for example, from instanceof check)
>> which is not collapsed during parsing.
>> Do nothing for such AddP node and don't process its users
>> during escape analysis since this code branch will go away.
>> Reviewed by:
>> Fix verified (y/n): y, test
>> Other testing:
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev