review (XS) for 6921992: failure in verify scheduling after 6792161
Vladimir.Kozlov at Sun.COM
Thu Feb 4 11:13:33 PST 2010
Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> Yes we can live without the fix though I think we need to fix it at some point. I'm going to push this to hotspot/hotspot first since these changes just were pushed up and I'd prefer the failure not to propagate out further.
> On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Changes look good.
>> Tom, was 679216 case rare? Can we live without the fix?
>> Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>> 6921992: failure in verify scheduling after 6792161
>>> The fix for 6792161 created problems with the scheduler verification
>>> logic so until I find a better for 6792161 I'm backing it out. This
>>> is just an anti-delta for the original fix.
>>> The previous changeset was http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/0e14bd797dad
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev