RFR (M): 8000805: JMM issue: short loads are non-atomic
vitalyd at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 16:22:46 PDT 2012
Just curious - in the ad files you didn't put ins_cost() for most of the
new matches, is that intentional?
Sent from my phone
On Oct 19, 2012 2:40 PM, "Vladimir Ivanov" <vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com>
> 282 lines changed: 255 ins; 27 del; 0 mod
> Ideal transformations during parsing & IGVN may rematerialize loads in
> order to reify useful information (like signed/unsigned load). Such
> behavior breaks JMM - instead of a single atomic load, multiple loads are
> performed violating consistency of loaded data.
> The fix is to disable such transformations at all, but perform relevant
> optimizations during matching.
> It fixes only C2 part of problem. С1 has similar deficiency, but it'll be
> addressed separately.
> Testing: failing test, test for new matching rules, JPRT, CTW (x86, x64 &
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Ivanov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev