RFR (S) : 8014362 : Need to expose some processor features via Unsafe interface
christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Fri May 17 18:51:53 PDT 2013
On May 17, 2013, at 2:28 PM, David Chase <david.r.chase at oracle.com> wrote:
> There was a spacing change that did not get reverted.
> This time, for sure.
> Note that this sets a property that won't get reset without a companion change in the JDK.
> (And the companion change is getting a bit of a pushback, though I hope to find, once I digest
> all the benchmarks I ran this afternoon, that it's not as scary as feared.)
"true" :) "false"
What's the smiley doing there? Is this all a joke? True or false?
P.S.: The change looks good. Happy weekend!
> On 2013-05-17, at 4:30 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Somehow globals.hpp showed up in the webrev. Otherwise changes are good.
>> On 5/17/13 1:28 PM, David Chase wrote:
>>> New webrev:
>>> It compiles (and runs) on both x86 and Sparc.
>>> On 2013-05-16, at 11:32 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> Okay, I agree with X86_ONLY().
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev