RFR/advice: 8054292 : Code comments leak in fastdebug builds
david.r.chase at oracle.com
Wed Aug 13 16:13:57 UTC 2014
There’s a problem with CodeBuffers leaking strings, and three possible solutions,
and I’m looking for advice/discussion as to which solution might be best.
The root cause is that though a CodeBuffer is supposed to exist for resource
management purposes, it was not properly coded that way. It’s currently coded
to leak code comment strings, but the “clean fix” (free strings in destructor) might
cause dangling pointers, and it’s difficult to prove that it won’t because it’s unlikely
that I have tested down all the squirrelly paths
I think there are three possible fixes with different risks:
1) “Clean fix”, reclaim resources in destructor. Risk: dangling pointer, bites us probably when
someone is debugging and prints something, otherwise the code comment strings are ignored.
That bug will be annoying as heck when it happens.
2) “Dutch Boy with asserts”, zero/free strings at critical points in the lifecycle of a CodeBuffer,
assert if a CodeBuffer is destroyed with unzeroed stings. Risk: we are still leaking, and a test will
fail, probably when execution goes down some weird and untested path. But we’ll get an hs_err
that explains the problem, so we can take steps to repair it.
3) “Dutch boy without asserts”, same as 2), but with no asserts. Instead of failing, it will
sometimes leak (but this will probably not occur that often) but it will not dangle pointers
and it will not crash for leaking.
The webrev illustrates the (potential) changes for all three solutions.
I started by trying to identify all sources of leaks (to prove that there was a leak, in particular)
by zeroing the string pointer when it was copied out, and then asserting it was zero in the
destructor. A leak, or failure to identify a point where strings are copied out, is then identified
by a crash.
Next I tried the clean fix (a one-liner on top of the changes for the one-leak-at-a-time code),
to see if it would cause any crashes. This was not entirely satisfactory since the strings are
for debugging purposes and most tests don’t check them; I did a run of jtreg with
PrintOptoAssembly turned on to see if this would provoke a crash, and it did not.
jtreg of compiler, gc, runtime
jtreg of compiler w/ PrintOptoAssembly and “clean fix”.
I tried to run kitchensink, but it failed for lack of jrockit.qa.stress.kitchensink.process.stress.main .
Local ute command was:
bin/ute -jdk $ff -testbase local/testbase/bigapps/Kitchensink -test bigapps/Kitchensink -env EXEC_DURATION=960
and I had previously done
bin/ute fetch all -site east -jdkrelease 9
Any ideas what I might be doing wrong with ute?
This was a problem on both Linux (Ubuntu) and MacOS (Mavericks)
I’m leaning towards “clean fix”, partly because I never saw anything that looked like creation of a dangling pointer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev