vitalyd at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 14:58:20 UTC 2015
Fixed the flag name in the subject.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Vitaly Davidovich <vitalyd at gmail.com>
> Hi guys,
> I'm hoping someone could clarify/confirm my understanding of this
> experimental flag's effects:
> 1) final instance array length is constant propagated? Even if array is
> passed in as ctor arg rather than being instantiated in the ctor?
> 2) final instance fields seen as never null are forever considered as
> such? So even if a method call on that object is fully eliminated (e.g. the
> method is empty) no null check is left behind?
> 3) concrete runtime type of the instance field is propagated to uses and
> no additional type checks are done? Say the declared type is an
> interface/abstract with multiple implementations loaded but only one type
> stored in the field - is a type check eliminated and calls are fully
> 4) primitive type final fields have their value constant propagated if
> compiler sees only one value always stored?
> 5) do derived classes and base class share field profile or not? For
> example subclasses always store concrete type but each subclass stores a
> different type from the others.
> Also, there's been some talk about doing these optimizations automatically
> with invalidations builtin. Just curious where that stands.
> sent from my phone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev