RFR(M): 8213528: fp registers should not need to be saved around a CallLeafNoFP
rkennke at redhat.com
Fri Nov 9 16:56:41 UTC 2018
>> The we don't need CallLeafNoFPNode, IdealKit::make_leaf_call_no_fp() and NO_FP value. Nobody use it
>> after your change. Or I am missing something?
> Indeed there's no more use of IdealKit::make_leaf_call_no_fp() and NO_FP
> after my change. I left both there because I suppose some existing calls
> to CallLeaf could be turned into the "new" CallLeafNoFP and so this code
> might be needed in the future but I can remove it if you like.
I supposed we'd use it from Shenandoah, right?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev