RFR: JDK-8212603: Need to step over GC barriers in Node::eqv_uncast()
rkennke at redhat.com
Wed Oct 17 20:34:10 UTC 2018
> On 10/17/2018 07:54 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> Node::eqv_uncast() checks if two nodes are equal (equivalent) behind
>> casts. It's used in many places concerning lock elimination. The trouble
>> is if the actual nodes are behind GC barriers, and we get the same node
>> behind two different GC barrier nodes, this would return false negative.
>> We have seen a bad case of this with Shenandoah, where lock elimination
>> was subtly thrown off by this, which led to eliminated locks not
>> re-locked properly during deoptimization.
>> I propose to also strip any possible GC barriers like this:
> Makes sense to me.
> Does it deserve a better name? I don't know. There are "only" 25 usages of the method, and it can be
> renamed without much fuzz? For example, Node::eqv_canonical? Node::eqv_final? Node::eqv_stripped?
> Don't rush to rename it though :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev