RFR (XS): 8033443: Test8000311 fails after latest changes to parallelize string and symbol table unlink
bengt.rutisson at oracle.com
Tue Feb 4 16:48:47 UTC 2014
This looks good to me.
One minor thing that I leave up to you to fix if you want to.
It seems more natural to me to pass an "is parallel" value to the
constructor of G1StringSymbolTableUnlinkTask rather than have it look at
G1CollectedHeap::use_parallel_gc_threads() itself to set the
On 2/3/14 5:04 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
> can I have reviews for the following change? It fixes the check that
> verify the correct amount of processed entries during string/symbol
> table unlink.
> The change adds an exception for the non-parallel case (i.e. the checks
> will always succeed in that case).
> The alternative would be to make the non-parallel case to also "claim"
> work, and use the parallel code. That would require somewhat larger
> refactoring of the string/symbol table code. In that case it would also
> be nice if the string/symbol table iteration did the same. I.e. it seems
> a good enough fix for now.
> jprt, jtreg (all gc tests)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev