RFR(S): 8237776: Shenandoah: Wrong result with Lucene test
rkennke at redhat.com
Fri Jan 31 12:49:48 UTC 2020
Thinking more about it: we should probably change the synopsis for the bug
- Fix is not in Shenandoah code, but shared. Even though only Shenandoah
currently seems to fall over it. Also, should probably draw attention of
- Maybe reflect what the problem is and/or what the fix is?
Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com> schrieb am Fr., 31. Jan. 2020, 10:58:
> Roland Westrelin <rwestrel at redhat.com> schrieb am Fr., 31. Jan. 2020,
>> > the patch looks good, but it lacks the x86_32 counterpart. Or would you
>> > rather handle that separately?
>> Actually, AFAIU, the 64 bits fix covers 32 bits too. 32bits needs xmm0
>> and xmm1 saved. So we're saving too many registers on 32 bits but that
>> seems pretty armless.
> Ah OK. Good then!
> (armless... nice typo! :-D )
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev