RFR 8245240: Shenandoah: support nesting evacuation OOM scope
shade at redhat.com
Wed May 20 18:00:50 UTC 2020
On 5/20/20 5:08 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Okay, then added assertion to make sure:
In push_evac_oom_scope, don't we want to assert that (level != sizeof(uint8_t)*8) or something? The
overflow there would be catastrophic, right?
Actually, now that I think of it, wouldn't it be safer to make _oom_scope_nesting_level uint32_t,
for example? That would be physically harder to overflow.
Otherwise looks fine.
More information about the hotspot-gc-dev