RFR(S): 8029351: assert(bt != T_OBJECT) failed: Guard is incorrect in VM:defmeth
david.r.chase at oracle.com
Mon Dec 9 06:42:19 PST 2013
On 2013-12-09, at 9:39 AM, Coleen Phillimore <coleen.phillimore at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 12/9/2013 9:17 AM, David Chase wrote:
>> I was attempting Christian's cleanup, and saw what would have been a nice one
>> tag. basic_type() == T_OBJECT
>> but that did not evaluate the same condition -- it also includes
>> is_klass_index() || is_string_index()
> These tags are temporary during class file parsing, so omitting them is safe (famous last words).
So is including them ALSO safe, since they should never occur?
I'd prefer to use an existing "are you an object" code rather than inventing another one.
I could also insert asserts that those two cases are not leaking through.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/attachments/20131209/e9a82a71/signature.asc
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev