RFR(M) 8072383: resolve conflicts between open and closed ports
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Thu Feb 19 15:44:28 UTC 2015
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 20:12 -0800, Dean Long wrote:
> Yes, good catch. I've update the webrev to webrev.8u60.01. Thanks for
> the review.
Has anyone tested those changes with a Zero build
(--with-jvm-variants=zero)? Specifically on arm/ppc? I'm testing it now
and get back to you.
> On 2/18/2015 4:45 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> > Did you missed to remove #elif ppc_32 in 8u60 changes in
> > src/share/vm/interpreter/templateTable.hpp?
> > Otherwise both versions look good.
> > Thanks,
> > Vlaidmir
> > On 2/18/15 4:26 PM, Dean Long wrote:
> >> Just to avoid confusion, let me clarify that the jdk9 changes below
> >> can't be pushed until after the open aarch64 port is merged into the
> >> main jdk9, as they are based on the staging repo.
> >> dl
> >> On 2/18/2015 4:02 PM, Dean Long wrote:
> >>> These changes resolve some issues with references to closed ports in
> >>> open hotspot code,
> >>> primarily by removing those references completely. I have included
> >>> the 8u60 backport
> >>> as well because it won't apply cleanly, and I may push it first
> >>> because the 9 changes are
> >>> blocked by JEP 237: Linux/AArch64 Port.
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlong/8072383/webrev.8u60.00/
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlong/8072383/webrev.9.00/
> >>> dl
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev