RFR(M): Backport of 8069412 : Locks need better debug-printing support

David Chase david.r.chase at oracle.com
Sat Feb 21 02:48:53 UTC 2015

Do I need a second review for a backport?


On 2015-02-20, at 7:41 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:

> Good.
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> On 2/20/15 11:33 AM, David Chase wrote:
>> I should have done this yesterday, but I did arrange a week of vacation before leaving so I can fix this WFH if necessary.
>> This is a backport of 8069412.
>> It was not a straight import of the patch.
>> The reason for the backport is that the bug that inspired the rant that became the bug
>> is actually an 8u bug, and still needs fixing/investigation.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8069412/webrev-backport.00/
>> Functionality of new logging code testing on OSX and Linux.
>> David

More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list