RFR 8068730: Increase the precision of the implementation of java.time.Clock.systemUTC()

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Jan 13 12:26:39 UTC 2015

Hi Daniel,

On 13/01/2015 7:53 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> On 13/01/15 04:52, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Here is the new webrev with Stephen & your feedback included
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8068730/webrev.01/
>>> (windows_time_stamp not renamed yet)
>> I checked the updated webrev.02 and everything looks good on the hotspot
>> side.
>> What are your plans for pushing this?
> Thanks David,
> My understanding is that I'll need to push that through hs-rt - since
> it has changes for hotspot. I believe I'll need two reviewers - is that
> right? Roger Riggs has also reviewed the changes on core-libs-dev, so
> is this good to go, or do both reviewers need to be members of the hsx
> project?

hsx project is defunct, so technically we're all just jdk9 reviewers, 
but we still like two reviews from hotspot team members.

> Also - I am not sure whether I need a sponsor (I have never pushed
> anything to hs-rt - I usually push in jdk9-dev) or whether I am
> allowed to push this myself (I'll use jprt in that case).

If you are a jdk9 committer then you can push yourself via jprt - full 
forest submission from top-level: "jprt submit -forest -testset hotspot"


> best regards,
> -- daniel
>> David
>> -----

More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list