RFR(S) 8030221: Checking for anonymous class should check for NULL as well as potential nesting
coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Tue Aug 16 18:53:03 UTC 2016
On 8/16/16 11:54 AM, harold seigel wrote:
> Hi Coleen,
> Thanks for the comments. In a different fix, for bug JDK-8058575
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058575>, I plan to require
> the host class to be an instance class and change the type of
> _host_klass to instanceKlass.
> Thanks, Harold
> On 8/16/2016 10:48 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> Can host class actually be an array class?
>> It seems like more error if the host class is a primitive, array, or
>> if it is another anonymous class.
>> Then you can pass it as InstanceKlass as host_class everwhere and not
>> have these casts.
>> On 8/15/16 3:34 PM, harold seigel wrote:
>>> Please review this fix for JDK-8030221. The fix makes sure that, if
>>> the specified host class for a VM anonymous is another anonymous
>>> class, that the actual host class is the specified host class's host
>>> class. For example, if named class N is the host class for
>>> anonymous class A1, and A1 is the specified host class for anonymous
>>> class A2, then the actual host class for A2 will be named class N.
>>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030221
>>> Open Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8030221/
>>> The fix was tested with the JCK Lang and VM tests, the hotpot, and
>>> java/lang, java/util and other JTreg tests, the NSK quick tests, and
>>> with the RBT runtime nightly tests.
>>> Thanks, Harold
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev