RFR(M): 8171181: Supporting heap allocation on alternative memory devices

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Wed Mar 8 08:52:34 UTC 2017

On 08/03/17 03:14, Kharbas, Kishor wrote:
> Hi Andrew!
> Thanks for the clarification. I understand what you mean now.
> I agree if NUMA is supported by the filesystem, it will be very
> useful and should be made available.  To do that, I have to find if
> the filesystem supports APIs to serve the same purpose as OS numa
> calls.

I don't think you have to do anything.  If numa is supported on the
mapped memory range it will work as it is.


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list