RFR(S): 8206075: add assertion for unbound assembler Labels for x86

Doerr, Martin martin.doerr at sap.com
Wed Jul 11 10:40:09 UTC 2018


I think the idea is good, but doesn't work in all cases.
We may bail out from code generation and discard the generated code leaving the label unbound.
We also may generate code with the purpose to determine its size. We don't need to bind labels because the code will never get executed.

Best regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: hotspot-runtime-dev [mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Vladimir Kozlov
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2018 03:34
To: Liu Xin <navy.xliu at gmail.com>; hotspot-runtime-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S): 8206075: add assertion for unbound assembler Labels for x86

I hit new assert in few other tests:



On 7/10/18 5:08 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Fix looks reasonable. I will test it in our framework.
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
> On 7/10/18 9:50 AM, Liu Xin wrote:
>> Hi, Community,
>> Could you please review this small patch?
>> Bug:  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075 
>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206075>
>> CR:  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.00/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8206075/webrev.00/>
>> Problem:
>> X86-32/64 will leave an unbound label if UseOnStackReplacement is OFF.
>> This patch align up x86 with other architectures(ppc, arm).
>> Add an assertion to the destructor of Label. It  will be wiped out in release build.
>> Previously, hotspot cannot pass this test with assertion on x86-64.
>> make run-test TEST=test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c1/Test7090976.java
>> If this CR is approved, Paul Hohensee will push it.
>> Thanks,
>> --lx

More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list