RFR (trivial) 8208074: [TESTBUG] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefineWithoutBytecodeCorruption/TestDescription.java failed with NullPointerException

coleen.phillimore at oracle.com coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Tue Jul 31 12:06:35 UTC 2018

On 7/31/18 3:29 AM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> Good catch.
> It is possible that this webrev does not fix the JDK-8202896.
> The JDK-8202896 is about timeouts which are normally intermittent (is 
> it right?).
> There are two options here:
>   A: close 8202896 as a dup of 8208074
>   B: keep the test problem listed and labeled with 8202896
> Let's wait for Coleen's answer.

I closed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206076 (timeouts with 
  as a duplicate of
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203820 (where I took 
InMemoryCompiler out of the threads)
because that's where the attempted fix was.

I think
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202896 (getting Too many open 
files intermittently)
should be closed as a duplicate too because it's the same root cause.

And this one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208074 (broken fix)
fixes my fix and will remove the test from the ProblemList.txt.

I believe it should be removed fromt he problem list because I don't 
think it will time out or intermittently fail again for the same 
reason.  If it times out or fails for a different reason, we should file 
a whole new bug, with that specific analysis.


> Thanks,
> Serguei
> On 7/31/18 00:16, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Sorry, I thought this had been pushed already, but it hasn't. But it 
>> still looks like JDK-8202896 should be closed as a dup, and it's 
>> unclear to me if JDK-8206076 has been fixed and this test can be 
>> removed from the problem list.
>> Chris
>> On 7/30/18 6:34 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
>>> Hi Coleen,
>>> Now that this had been pushed, I assume JDK-8202896 should be closed 
>>> as a dup. And what about JDK-8206076? Is it fixed by this change also?
>>> thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> On 7/30/18 1:49 PM, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> Summary: fixed refactoring caused by JDK-8203820
>>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8208074.01/webrev
>>>> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208074
>>>> Ran the test in mach5 on all Oracle supported platforms. Also took 
>>>> the test out of ProblemList.txt because JDK-8203820 fixes 
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202896.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Coleen

More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list