RFR 8243572: Multiple tests fail with assert(cld->klasses() != 0LL) failed: unexpected NULL for cld->klasses()
MARKUS.GRONLUND at ORACLE.COM
Tue Apr 28 21:59:26 UTC 2020
“Hidden” genera (default) “Strong Hidden” species?
If need to make explicit, “Weak Hidden” vs “Strong Hidden”
“Weak” as a term induces the, historically intuitive, idea of not-strong. “Regular” and “Normal” are too general for this concept, especially as Hidden Classes are introduced to be an alternative to (historically) “Regular” and “Normal” classes.
Sent from my iPhone
>> On 28 Apr 2020, at 23:12, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 4/28/20 1:13 PM, John Rose wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2020, at 1:10 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> "non-strong" is the best term I can come up with.
>> If strong is the non-default choice, then any of “regular”,
>> “normal”, or “weak” would be OK in my book. I know
>> “weak” is no longer a technical term, but as an informal
>> opposite to “strong” it would work, now.
> "regular" or "normal" is a good one. I didn't suggest that because we use "normal class" to refer to non-hidden class. For this specific discussion about JFR user-visible description, "regular/normal hidden classes" is probably better.
>> (This is a big sign of progress: There’s little remaining to
>> discuss except bike shed colors!)
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev