<i18n dev> Review Request - 8021121: ISO 4217 Amendment Number 156
naoto.sato at oracle.com
Tue Aug 6 09:45:20 PDT 2013
There already is a logic in Currency class to deal with such a future
transition nicely. That's what I meant.
Then it will be a regression till 1/1/2014. I don't see any problem
using the transition logic here, IMO.
On 8/6/13 2:13 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
> Hi Yong,
> I think it's OK to use EUR without specifying the transition date-time
> for JDK 8.
> On 8/6/2013 11:44 AM, Yong Huang wrote:
>> Hi Naoto,
>> To place the transition logic, do you mean I need to add comments in
>> source file or do I just need to explain it in this email thread?
>> The currency change will take place in January 2014 and Java 8 is
>> still not released at that time. So when Java 8 is released, the
>> currency of LV will already be changed. If I fix the bug after Jan
>> 2014, it will be near the release date of Java 8 and maybe only
>> stopper bug is allowed to fixed at that time.
>> On 2013/8/6 2:32, Naoto Sato wrote:
>>> At the moment, they still use LVL for their currency, so I think the
>>> transition logic needs to be placed.
>>> On 8/4/13 7:46 PM, Yong Huang wrote:
>>>> This is the review request for
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yhuang/8021121/webrev.00/
More information about the i18n-dev