<i18n dev> RFR: 8026772: test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone/Bug6317929.java failing
masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com
Thu Oct 24 01:55:59 PDT 2013
The test detected the translation changes as regression, but that was
unnecessary? I prefer to remove this test rather than changing the data.
On 10/24/2013 12:12 AM, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi Masayoshi,
> At that time I was asked to have regression test to validate each
> translation changes.
> With our new translation process for TimeZoneNames and new planned
> regression tests from Aleksej for JDK-8025051
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051>, I believe we can
> remove those unnecessary tests in the future (probably together with
> JDK-8025051 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051>).
> For now, webrev  looks fine to take care of the short term
> regression failure.
> On 13?10?22? 09:29 ??, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> 27 *@summary Test case for tzdata2005m support for 9 locales
>> What's the purpose of this test? Do we really need to keep this one?
>> On 10/22/2013 8:13 PM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>>> Can I have a review for 8026772  fix.
>>> The webrev link: 
>>> The timezone test is failed because of the changed TimeZone names
>>> introduced in 8025255 .
>>> This timezone names were changed according to updated translation
>>> resource files introduced by 8025215 .
>>> The fix changes the hard-coded time zone names for
>>> "Australia/Currie" to the values specified in 8025215.
>>> Thanks in Advance,
>>>  http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8026772
>>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8026772/webrev.00/
>>>  http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8025255
>>>  http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8025215
More information about the i18n-dev