<i18n dev> RFR: 8224560: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2019a and 8225580: tzdata2018i integration causes test failures on jdk-13
ramanand.patil at oracle.com
Mon Jul 8 10:35:03 UTC 2019
Thank you for your review.
Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8224560/webrev.01/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew John Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2019 9:53 PM
> To: Ramanand Patil <ramanand.patil at oracle.com>; core-libs-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; i18n-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: <i18n dev> RFR: 8224560: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to
> tzdata2019a and 8225580: tzdata2018i integration causes test failures on jdk-
> On 05/07/2019 15:16, Ramanand Patil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Please review the patch for tzdata2019a integration into jdk project.
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8224560/webrev.00/
> > Bugs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224560
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225580
> > Summary:
> > - The fix contains cumulative tzdata changes from tzdata2018i and
> tzdata2019a, as tzdata2018i was not integrated into jdk/jdk earlier.
> > - In JDK-13/14, multiple failures were seen during integration of tzdata2018i
> (JDK-8225580), those are fixed now. Many thanks to Naoto for providing a fix
> for this in CLDRConverter.java.
> I would guess this is due to the CLDR update (JDK-8221432: Upgrade CLDR to
> Version 35.1) in OpenJDK 13, making TimeZone.getAvailableIDs
> inappropriate in some way?
> Fix looks good. One minor change:
> + AVAILABLE_TZIDS = new
> + HashSet(ZoneId.getAvailableZoneIds());
> is missing the <String> or <>:
> + AVAILABLE_TZIDS = new
> + HashSet<>(ZoneId.getAvailableZoneIds());
> Will this fix also resolve JDK-8225580? If so, it's probably worth mentioning
> both bug IDs in the commit.
Yes, this fix will also resolve JDK-8225580, hence included in the subject line.
And thank you, I will add both bug IDs in the commit message.
> > - There are 2 type of test failures in TestZoneInfo310.java file, which are
> solved in this patch by providing workarounds, But a permanent fix needs to
> be added in future for the same. Below are the 2 bugs created to track the
> development on it:
> > 1. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223388:
> TestZoneInfo310.java fails post tzdata2018i integration:
> > This failure is seen for the TimeZones which are having zone rules defined
> till year 2037 or beyond. For now, the failing zones are skipped.
> > The supporting test class ZoneInfo.java has maxYear defined
> ndar/zi/Zoneinfo.java#l40, changing this max value greater than the zone
> rule's last year also fixes the issue, but further investigation is needed on why
> this boundary condition is affecting the test behavior.
> I wonder if 2037 is in someway related to the rollover of 32-bit time values?
I think, not directly related but how the test and JDK handles these values.
In JDK, the transitions beyond 2037 are delegated to SimpleTimeZone, and I think the test somehow miscalculates it.
I think, I should re-visit and see if these test are really needed now. As per the long standing bug JDK-8166983 suggestion was to remove the whole tests from test/sun/util/calendar/zi
> > 2. JDK-8227293: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227293
> TestZoneInfo310.java fails post tzdata2019a integration for Palestine zone
> > There are many hacks and assumptions in the class
> > sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfoFile.java. This issue looks because of the
> > code starting from here:
> > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/963924f1c891/src/java.base/sha
> > re/classes/sun/util/calendar/ZoneInfoFile.java#l552
> > There is an assumption where the transition date is >=24,(line 577 and 599)
> it assumes it is the "last" rule, but it is not last rule in case of Asia/Gaza and
> Asia/Hebron zones.
> > For now, I have fixed these 2 problematic timezones by overwriting the
> > assumption made on line 577, where date of month dom = startRule.dom; I
> think, overriding of the second jdk hack on line 599 is not required as the
> "dom" is calculated from the last rule there. Keeping this bug open as we
> need to find a generic solution for this issue, without hard-coding the values
> and adding specific time zone names in exclusion as seen in many places in
> this class file.
> > - The patch has passed all the related testing including JCK tests.
> > Regards,
> > Ramanand.
> Looks good to me, with the above minor adjustment.
> Andrew :)
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net) Fingerprint
> = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
More information about the i18n-dev