<i18n dev> RFR: 8251499: no-placeholder compact number patterns throw IllegalArgumentException
huizhe.wang at oracle.com
Sat Aug 15 01:21:15 UTC 2020
Looks good to me.
While a negative divisor representing no zeros is newly introduced, the
"divisor > 0" checks seem to have always been beneficial. I had to
count the number of ""s in COMPACT_PATTERN13 :-)
Have a great weekend!
On 8/14/2020 3:20 PM, naoto.sato at oracle.com wrote:
> Please review the fix for the following issue:
> The proposed changeset is located at:
> The current implementation of CompactNumberFormat assumes that there
> is always the number placeholder part in compact patterns. This is not
> always true. In fact, upcoming CLDR 38 resurrects such patterns, so
> this fix is a precursor to support CLDR 38.
More information about the i18n-dev