<i18n dev> RFR: 8267521: Post JEP 411 refactoring: maximum covering > 50K [v3]
prr at openjdk.java.net
Fri May 28 03:15:12 UTC 2021
On Fri, 28 May 2021 02:50:55 GMT, Weijun Wang <weijun at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/Component.java line 630:
>>> 628: }
>>> 630: @SuppressWarnings("removal")
>> I'm confused. I thought the reason this wasn't done in the JEP implementation PR is because of refactoring
>> that was needed because of the usage in this static block and you could not apply the annotation here.
>> Yet it seems you are doing exactly what was supposed to be impossible with no refactoring.
>> Can you explain ?
> There *is* a tiny refactoring here: a new variable `s2` is introduced so the 2nd `doPrivileged` call on line 636 is now also in a declaration statement (for `s2`) and therefore annotatable. Without this I cannot add the annotation on line 635.
Ok. But I will quote you
"This happens when a deprecated method is called inside a static block. The annotation can only be added to a declaration and here it must be the whole class"
So the way you explained this before made it sound like any time there was any SM API usage in a static block, the entire class needed to be annotated.
Why has the explanation changed ?
More information about the i18n-dev