From geertjan at apache.org  Fri Feb  7 11:58:35 2020
From: geertjan at apache.org (Geertjan Wielenga)
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:58:35 +0100
Subject: @Language annotation for JDK 13 text blocks
Message-ID: <CACkjAxTOK8xoHCAv-vqpK+si2KBHQ4KrQW-w6pr=RKvTitAMHw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

It would be of great support for IDEs, editors, and tools of various kinds
if a @Language annotation would be part of the support for text blocks, so
that tooling would be able to determine which editor should be injected
within the text block.

For example, imagine this annotation on top of a text block:

@Language="text/html"

That would then be used by IDEs, editors, tools, etc, to determine that the
text within the block is HTML and that therefore, for the tools that
support this (e.g., NetBeans, IntelliJ IDEA), an HTML editor would then be
injected within the text block, which would make HTML-oriented syntax
coloring, code completion, etc, available within the text block.

If this meets with enthusiasm, what would the next steps be? An addition to
the text block spec or a new spec or something different?

Thanks,

Geertjan

From lp.edoardo at gmail.com  Fri Feb  7 12:34:16 2020
From: lp.edoardo at gmail.com (Edoardo Luppi)
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:34:16 +0100
Subject: @Language annotation for JDK 13 text blocks
In-Reply-To: <CACkjAxTOK8xoHCAv-vqpK+si2KBHQ4KrQW-w6pr=RKvTitAMHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACkjAxTOK8xoHCAv-vqpK+si2KBHQ4KrQW-w6pr=RKvTitAMHw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFu654Z3sbLhDAhkC-ZWzp-KWJxk+31tw+5kQdtiR9xtyafJAw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!

Mmh I have mixed feelings about this.
Most people I've met, plus me in this case, prefer to use comment-based
injection (// language=LANG_ID) as comments are less noticeable than
Annotations. Also, I don't think introducing this new Annotation in
java.lang (I suppose) is appropriate and maybe adding complexity to the
spec isn't worth it.

On the other hand, as of now sharing in-code language injection metadata is
difficult because Annotations are tied to the IDE/editor, which means
explicitly imported, e.g. from org.intellij.lang.annotations.Language. In
the worst case scenario you'd have multiple Annotations specified for the
same string literal, one per IDE/editor, or a mixture of Annotations and
comments.
Standardizing how injection is to be described could be a good thing! And
not only for text blocks.

Just my two cents.
Thanks!

Edoardo

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:59 PM Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan at apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It would be of great support for IDEs, editors, and tools of various kinds
> if a @Language annotation would be part of the support for text blocks, so
> that tooling would be able to determine which editor should be injected
> within the text block.
>
> For example, imagine this annotation on top of a text block:
>
> @Language="text/html"
>
> That would then be used by IDEs, editors, tools, etc, to determine that the
> text within the block is HTML and that therefore, for the tools that
> support this (e.g., NetBeans, IntelliJ IDEA), an HTML editor would then be
> injected within the text block, which would make HTML-oriented syntax
> coloring, code completion, etc, available within the text block.
>
> If this meets with enthusiasm, what would the next steps be? An addition to
> the text block spec or a new spec or something different?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Geertjan
>

From waltimlmm at gmail.com  Tue Feb 11 20:12:33 2020
From: waltimlmm at gmail.com (walter lucas)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:12:33 -0300
Subject: Investigating the benefits and implications of using lambda
 expressions in Java programs
Message-ID: <CAEyC6dX3URBmmrSqmZD3xX_js2LUT8h6_9xLwxVgPp9MxgxexA@mail.gmail.com>

 Dear all,

I'm a Ph.D. student at the  University of Bras?lia (UNB), Brazil. We are
currently investigating the benefits and implications of using lambda
expressions in Java programs so that we could later improve existing tools
that automatically refactor legacy code to introduce lambda expressions.

As part of our research, we are conducting a survey that collects the
developers' perceptions of a couple of transformations recommended by tools
to refactor either an anonymous inner class or a for-loop into lambda
expressions and streams. It would be of great help if you could answer this
survey, which does not take too much time (5 minutes on average). Your
participation is voluntary and confidential. You might withdraw at any
time. The link for the survey is http://qarefactoring.com/

We will make our results (data sets, data analysis, and tools) publicly
available.  Thank you so much for your time, and please do not hesitate to
contact me if you have any questions.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
Att Walter Lucas.

From maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com  Wed Feb 12 01:27:33 2020
From: maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com (Maurizio Cimadamore)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 01:27:33 +0000
Subject: RFR [15] 8238918 idea.sh should work with both mercurial and git
 repo
In-Reply-To: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
References: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <8752c359-05e8-15ee-c57e-21431391d4c2@oracle.com>

Looks good!

Thanks
Maurizio

On 11/02/2020 22:29, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Please review a small change to the idea.sh script that generates an 
> IntelliJ project.
> It detects either Mercurial or Git repos and generates the appropriate 
> vcs.xml.
>
> Webrev:
> ?? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-idea-git-8238918/
>
> Issue:
> ? https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238918
>
> Thanks, Roger
>

From Roger.Riggs at oracle.com  Tue Feb 11 22:29:39 2020
From: Roger.Riggs at oracle.com (Roger Riggs)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:29:39 -0500
Subject: RFR [15] 8238918 idea.sh should work with both mercurial and git repo
Message-ID: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>

Please review a small change to the idea.sh script that generates an 
IntelliJ project.
It detects either Mercurial or Git repos and generates the appropriate 
vcs.xml.

Webrev:
 ?? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-idea-git-8238918/

Issue:
 ? https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238918

Thanks, Roger


From erik.joelsson at oracle.com  Tue Feb 11 22:40:34 2020
From: erik.joelsson at oracle.com (Erik Joelsson)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:40:34 -0800
Subject: RFR [15] 8238918 idea.sh should work with both mercurial and git
 repo
In-Reply-To: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
References: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <3bc7f26a-3122-95a0-ffff-e3406702548a@oracle.com>

Looks good.

/Erik

On 2020-02-11 14:29, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Please review a small change to the idea.sh script that generates an 
> IntelliJ project.
> It detects either Mercurial or Git repos and generates the appropriate 
> vcs.xml.
>
> Webrev:
> ?? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-idea-git-8238918/
>
> Issue:
> ? https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238918
>
> Thanks, Roger
>

From lance.andersen at oracle.com  Wed Feb 12 11:57:28 2020
From: lance.andersen at oracle.com (Lance Andersen)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:57:28 -0500
Subject: RFR [15] 8238918 idea.sh should work with both mercurial and git
 repo
In-Reply-To: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
References: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5258519C-1E64-4FFD-9D6A-924EAC2B6C24@oracle.com>

+1

> On Feb 11, 2020, at 5:29 PM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Please review a small change to the idea.sh script that generates an IntelliJ project.
> It detects either Mercurial or Git repos and generates the appropriate vcs.xml.
> 
> Webrev:
>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-idea-git-8238918/
> 
> Issue:
>   https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8238918
> 
> Thanks, Roger
> 

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>




From erik.helin at oracle.com  Wed Feb 12 07:15:36 2020
From: erik.helin at oracle.com (Erik Helin)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:15:36 -0000
Subject: RFR [15] 8238918 idea.sh should work with both mercurial and git
 repo
In-Reply-To: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
References: <cdd2eab2-b115-380a-ef50-6683c2db03be@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <8a7f70dc-96e2-cda6-e1dc-f41d86aee78b@oracle.com>

On 2/11/20 11:29 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Please review a small change to the idea.sh script that generates an 
> IntelliJ project.
> It detects either Mercurial or Git repos and generates the appropriate 
> vcs.xml.
> 
> Webrev:
>  ?? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-idea-git-8238918/

Looks good!

Thanks,
Erik