[11u] RFR(S): 8250635 backport: MethodArityHistogram should use Compile_lock in favour of fancy checks
martin.doerr at sap.com
Wed Apr 14 09:21:31 UTC 2021
Yes. Just let me know when it's ready.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schmidt, Lutz <lutz.schmidt at sap.com>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 14. April 2021 11:18
> To: Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com>; hotspot-compiler-
> dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.java.net; Hohensee,
> Paul <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Subject: Re: [11u] RFR(S): 8250635 backport: MethodArityHistogram should
> use Compile_lock in favour of fancy checks
> Thank you, Martin and Paul, for your reviews.
> Submit will have to wait another day. I was too late for testing last night.
> I will need a sponsor anyway. Is it ok to contact you, Martin, once the tests
> are done successfully?
> On 14.04.21, 11:06, "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr at sap.com> wrote:
> Hi Lutz,
> your backport looks good.
> Best regards,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On
> > Behalf Of Schmidt, Lutz
> > Sent: Dienstag, 13. April 2021 22:02
> > To: hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net; jdk-updates-
> > dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: Re: [11u] RFR(S): 8250635 backport: MethodArityHistogram
> > use Compile_lock in favour of fancy checks
> > Sorry for spamming, forgot jdk-updates-dev.
> > Lutz
> > On 13.04.21, 21:43, "Schmidt, Lutz" <lutz.schmidt at sap.com> wrote:
> > Dear Community,
> > I would appreciate receiving reviews for this downport change. It is a
> > change in one file only. Unfortunately, it did not apply clean.
> > Original bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250635
> > Downport webrev:
> > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8250635.11u.01/
> > Tests:
> > SAP's internal build and test farm. Results pending.
> > Thank you!
> > Lutz
More information about the jdk-updates-dev