JDK-8217305, JDK-8209002 and fixes
Andrew John Hughes
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Tue Mar 12 04:00:22 UTC 2019
On 11/03/2019 22:34, Kevin Walls wrote:
> No problem...
> Generally the confusing part I see is, it's not obvious if RFR emails
> were replaced with the fix-request keyword, and a Fix Request bug
> template/comment. I see they are not, but it's not clear if they
> duplicate each other, or if they intend to separately deal with
> technical approval and push approval, the RFR vs RFA emails we had in
> the past.
I believe the Fix Request comment replaces the body of an RFA e-mail
(i.e. why should this be allowed, does it apply cleanly, if not where
was it reviewed).
Reviews (RFRs) work as they would for the current development tree.
Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
More information about the jdk8u-dev