[8u, 11u] Wiki Page updates
Andrew John Hughes
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Wed Mar 13 15:55:37 UTC 2019
On 13/03/2019 07:58, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>> As I said yesterday , I think we need a label for fixes that are in
>> 8u-dev but are candidates for the current 8u after the initial
>> integration. Leaving this to bug comments makes them hard for us to find.
>> I suggest 8u-CPU-critical-request and 11u-CPU-critical-request as
>> previously used .
> I think it sounds reasonable. We can use jdk8u-critical-request and jdk11u-critical-request, since we are not planning to ship CPUs in OpenJDK. This will avoid namespace collisions with Oracle.
> I also think this should not only apply for changes that are already in jdk8u-dev/jdk11u-dev and shall be brought to jdk8u/jdk11u but also for direct pushes into jdk8u/jdk11u.
> What do other people think, especially aph? If we agree on it, I'll update this part in the wiki and we can start living up to it.
That sounds fine to me. Presumably, these would be paired with
jdk8u-critical-approved and jdk11u-critical-approved.
Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
More information about the jdk8u-dev