[8u] [RFR] 8175120: Remove old tests on kdc timeout policy
Andrew John Hughes
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Thu Mar 14 00:10:30 UTC 2019
On 13/03/2019 08:08, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>>> Adding security-dev as reviews should happen on the corresponding area
>>> lists. Even for 8.
>> I'm not sure about this. We've never done that for 7u under Red Hat
>> leadership and I wonder whether it potentially risks fixes being delayed
>> by Oracle reviewers that are no longer interesting in working on 8u, not
>> to mention creating additional noise on the other lists.
> It was the practice for JDK 8 updates so far. For me, the main benefit of including other lists in update reviews is the notification of potential reviewers that would usually not read the update mailing lists.
Yeah, I've done it when Oracle were still leading the project. I guess I
just kind of assumed the noise wouldn't be welcome on the main lists,
but you make a good point about a wider reviewership. I'll forward the
ones I've posted so far.
Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
More information about the jdk8u-dev