Shall we tag 212 for openjfx?
xxinliu at amazon.com
Tue Mar 19 21:48:19 UTC 2019
A JDK8u distribution need to include OpenJFX, but I found that the openjfx-8u repo doesn’t have a tag corresponding to 212.
Is it intentional? If we don’t have any change of JFX into 212 release, shall we tag it or just fall back to use 8u202-ga?
More information about the jdk8u-dev