RFR(s): backport of 8031126: java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadUserTime.java fails intermittently
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 14:30:20 UTC 2021
Looks good to me and pretty trivial.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:02 PM Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:
> Ping. :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> on behalf of "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 at 1:43 PM
> To: Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>, Andrey Petushkov <andrey at azul.com>, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>
> Cc: "jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: RE: RFR(s): backport of 8031126: java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadUserTime.java fails intermittently
> I've taken the liberty of re-doing the backport. It's clean except for a context diff at the start of hunk #1.
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031126
> Patch: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/af53a220ea60
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8031126/webrev.8u.00/
> On 2/19/20, 8:45 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Andrew Hughes" <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 19/02/2020 13:00, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > Uploaded webrev at https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fijiol/8031126/webrev.00/
> > Thanks,
> > Andrey
> > On 19.02.2020 07:20, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> On 31/07/2019 16:23, Andrey Petushkov wrote:
> >>> Hi Aleksey,
> >>> I'll do
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Andrey
> >>>> On 31 Jul 2019, at 15:54, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 7/16/19 7:42 PM, Fedor Burdun wrote:
> >>>>> The issue described in bugs 8031126/8030631 is still reproducible on java8.
> >>>>> May I request a backport of the changeset http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/af53a220ea60 to java8?
> >>>> This makes sense. Is there anyone from Azul to assist you with following this checklist?
> >>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/JDKUpdates/How+to+contribute+a+fix
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Aleksey
> >> Is there a webrev for this backport?
> >> Thanks,
> Backport looks right, but I think we should probably backport
> JDK-8036122 first (which includes the changes to proc_stat_path).
> That should then make this change a clean backport.
> I take a look at this and get back to you.
> Andrew :)
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04 C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
More information about the jdk8u-dev