brian.goetz at oracle.com
Tue Sep 3 11:37:49 PDT 2013
Plowing through all of these today...I've got just about all the
directly actionable ones processed, stumbling a bit on the less
actionable ones (e.g., "This section needs work.")
I've updated the docs at the temporary site.
Old docs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/doctmp/doc0
New docs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/doctmp/doc1
And posted a "specdiff" between them at:
On 9/2/2013 2:42 PM, Tim Peierls wrote:
> I sent Brian comments on the package summary a couple of days ago. I am
> curious to see whether there's any overlap or disagreement between what
> Joe wrote and what I wrote, but I'm sort of hoping Brian will summarize
> all of the responses rather than having to wade through them myself.
> (Yes, I know that just adds to Brian's work pile, but some sort of
> summary will be needed in any case.)
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
> <mailto:joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I just sent Brian comments on the package description and the
> BaseStream family of interfaces.
> Overall, I like the way this is coming together. The package
> description is substantial, but it's worth the programmer's time.
> The references to package-description in the Stream methods are
> effective. Hey, I *feel* like I understand.
> However, there's plenty of room for improvement. I'd be happy to
> send my detailed review - or a simplified summary - to this list if
> there is interest.
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com
> <mailto:brian.goetz at oracle.com>> wrote:
> Have I mentioned that reviews of the specs and package doc at:
> would be appreciated?
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers