Java 7 -> Java8 code breakage scenarios
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Thu Feb 28 02:31:13 PST 2013
On 28/02/13 06:43, Boaz Nahum wrote:
> Why? You fixed them all the day I mentioned them. Do you want me do it
From your email I guessed you had to workaround new bugs. I probably
have mis-interpreted. Good to know that everything is looking almost
sane on your part.
Regarding the jar dependencies issue you discovered, I guess it would be
really helpful if you could come up with a tractable case in which the
compiler is looking at more classes than in the past. I would expect
such redundant dependencies to be caused by the default method lookups
(in many case Java 7 compiler doesn't even look at interfaces) - but it
might also be some lingering bug in the implementation.
> On Feb 28, 2013 12:22 AM, "Maurizio Cimadamore"
> <maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
> <mailto:maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com>> wrote:
> On 27/02/13 21:11, Boaz Nahum wrote:
> Well, I am not expert. I just finished building 3M lines
> project with JDK 8
> lambda, and the only real issue (beside compiler bugs ) is
> the dependcy
> requirements between compilation units.
> Can you please report such bugs?
More information about the lambda-spec-observers