aph at redhat.com
Tue Dec 4 10:51:36 UTC 2018
On 12/4/18 10:39 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I see John Rose's
> comments about the cost of maintaining the footprint cost of today's
> ThreadLocals, but the idea of searc
I'm sorry, that sentence is completely incoherent.
I meant to say that I understand John Rose's point about not wanting to
increase the footprint of fibers, but the cost of searching the stack
is not going to be pleasant. I don't believe that the cost of maintaining
a little fiber-local state to facilitate fast lookups is necessarily
worth avoiding. Oh no, I'm kibitzing again, so I'll stop there!
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
More information about the loom-dev