hg: loom/loom: 2 new changesets

forax at univ-mlv.fr forax at univ-mlv.fr
Tue Jan 8 10:06:55 UTC 2019

it can be protected by a Lookup ?


----- Mail original -----
> De: "Alan Bateman" <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>
> À: "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr>, "Ron Pressler" <ron.pressler at oracle.com>
> Cc: "loom-dev" <loom-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Janvier 2019 08:46:29
> Objet: Re: hg: loom/loom: 2 new changesets

> On 07/01/2019 22:33, Remi Forax wrote:
>> Hi,
>> for the StackWalker API, i would prefer to get the ContinuationScope instead of
>> the name of the continuation scope,
>> given that the continuation scope can be a user defined object, it means you can
>> insert user defined object in the stacktrace which will be very helpful for
>> people that write interpreters on top of Java.
> A ContinuationScope is something that needs to be guarded closely so
> leaking a reference when doing a stack walk would need a lot of
> consideration. Also STE is Serializable so there are several issues
> there too.
> -Alan

More information about the loom-dev mailing list