The class cache
tal.liron at threecrickets.com
Wed Mar 12 12:41:30 UTC 2014
Great work, Hannes!
With the jdk9 version, it seems caching improves performance by two
orders of magnitude. :) And a simple benchmark shows the same code
working twice as fast in Nashorn as compared to Rhino.
This leaves me in a strange position in terms of what to tell my users.
Should I recommend waiting until 8u20 is out? (And when is that going to
be?) Or would it make sense for me to provide my own custom-built
I'm worried, of course, about a custom-built jar, because it would be a
snapshot of a development version.
I really, really wish this feature could make it to the official OpenJDK
8 release. Any strings you guys can pull to make it happen?
On 03/12/2014 08:06 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
> Am 2014-03-12 12:44, schrieb Tal Liron:
>> Hannes, I would like to test this.
>> It doesn't seem to be on the main Nashorn repository:
>> Is there a separate repository I should be using?
> You can get it here:
> In case you have problems with building I can send you a nashorn.jar
> via private mail. Just let me know.
>> On 03/12/2014 05:50 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>>> Hi Tal,
>>> I'm right now pushing a change for JDK-8021350 that allows sharing
>>> script classes between global scopes. Currently, script classes are
>>> bound to the global object in various ways, so the change is not
>>> trivial, and it's not possible to share compiled scripts between
>>> global scopes with the nashorn.jar in current JDK8 builds. The
>>> script sharing feature is planned for the 8u20 release.
>>> The class sharing will be per script engine, meaning that if you use
>>> multiple scopes with one script engine classes will be reused, when
>>> you use multiple script engines scripts will be recompiled for each
>>> I'd be interested to know whether this would work for you. If you'd
>>> like to test the class sharing feature I can help you getting started.
>>> Am 2014-03-12 10:27, schrieb Tal Liron:
>>>> In Nashorn, the ClassCache is set per Global instance.
>>>> This is fine if your application has only one global instance.
>>>> However, my application design involves creating many Global
>>>> instances. (Actually, I create and destroy them on the fly per user
>>>> request in an HTTP server scenario.) The problem is that all code
>>>> has to constantly be recompiled, and the cache is essentially never
>>>> used. Since recompilation is so very expensive in Nashorn, this
>>>> results in awful performance.
>>>> How can I implement a shared ClassCache? I can't extend and modify
>>>> Global behavior, because it's a final class.
>>>> I've tried to cache ScriptFunction instances myself, but I get
>>>> exceptions when I try to run them with a different Global instance
>>>> than the one that created them.
More information about the nashorn-dev