rsocket Issue #2

Chris Hegarty chris.hegarty at
Mon Feb 25 18:07:29 UTC 2019


On 13/02/2019 22:00, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2019, at 19:06, Hefty, Sean <sean.hefty at> wrote:
>>> The `rpoll` behaviour I observe is clearly different than regular
>>> `poll` ( which will wake up all waiters ). Is this a bug, or expected
>>> behaviour of the thread-less rsocket implementation?
>> This is likely an implementation issue, but the intent should be to mimic poll behavior here.  So I would consider this a bug, and it would take some work to figure out how to handle this in a way that doesn't result in races.
> Sure. Is it possible to get this issue into the librdma bug tracking system, and have it evaluated.

Has this issue been filed in the librdma bug tracking system?

I see this issue, along with the previous issue I reported [1], as
potential blockers for the integration of the RDMA support in the JDK.



More information about the nio-dev mailing list