FXML and Classloading
greg.x.brown at oracle.com
Thu May 31 07:42:44 PDT 2012
> Ok - thanks looks like i looked at an old javafxrt.jar. Anyways don't
> you think giving the type-classloader precendence would be a good idea?
Possibly, but I'm not sure it is necessary. One thing we're not currently doing that we probably should be is instantiating the default JavaFXBuilderFactory using FXMLLoader's current class loader. If we do that, then wouldn't this problem go away?
More information about the openjfx-dev