TextField Document model

Scott Palmer swpalmer at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 14:09:13 PDT 2012

On 2012-10-18, at 3:28 PM, Richard Bair <richard.bair at oracle.com> wrote:

> I don't have any philosophical reason for not having content be mutable. My only concern here is that having it mutable introduces some additional complexity in the class / skin -- or at least it might.
> BTW, if you find that changing it dynamically works perfect, I'd be happy to do the code review (including Jonathan).

Adding a new constructor to set it once would likely work for most cases.
I suspect making it dynamic is a lot more work.


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list