StubToolkit must go!

Jim Graham james.graham at
Wed Feb 6 16:53:43 PST 2013

On 2/6/13 8:30 AM, Richard Bair wrote:
> So my thought here is that if we can run 30,000 tests in < 5 min by allowing nearly all of them to be run in the same VM, then that is probably better than running 3,000 tests in separate VMs for the sake of our pre-commit testing. For the nightly run, we can certainly run them all in their same VM so that the analysis phase of failures is much simpler.

For reliability testing running them all in the same VM would actually 
improve the coverage of our tests.  If there is a snowball failure, then 
an option to run them in separate VMs to sanity check if a single test 
is causing the problem would be nice, but if we can't survive running 
them all in the same VM then something is wrong with the product and we 
should definitely know that...


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list