mike at plan99.net
Tue Dec 16 21:21:38 UTC 2014
Watch out for Angular. They're rewriting it from scratch and Angular 2 is
web dev is much, much higher than with Java desktop app dev.
GWT has been around for a while and Google use it a lot internally. It's
not likely to suffer sudden disowning or massive churn.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Mark Fortner <phidias51 at gmail.com> wrote:
> GWT is probably closest to what you're looking for. You write java and it
> catch up though, the popularity of gwt has been on the wane. Angularjs has
> been gaining a lot of traction as well as Polymer. But these more recent
> frameworks are not java-like. I'm sure web developers would probably have
> some better suggestions.
> On Dec 16, 2014 7:29 AM, "Jeff Martin" <jeff at reportmill.com> wrote:
> > You’re spot on, Mark. I need to do a little
> > lightweight-in-the-browser-without-the-JVM development, and as a
> > Swing/JavaFX developer, I don’t want my fingers/brain to bleed too much.
> > development. I’m hoping there’s a popular and capable standard for people
> > who come from the Java world.
> > jeff
> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Jim Laskey (Oracle) <
> james.laskey at oracle.com>
> > wrote:
> > He mentioned JavaFX Script language, so I assume he wants to work with FX
> > Look at https://blogs.oracle.com/nashorn/entry/jjs_fx as an example
> > Cheers,
> > -- Jim
> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Mark Fortner <phidias51 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just to be clear, you're looking for a js library that has JavaFX-like
> > components, an event model, threading, graphics, animation and charting.
> > And runs in a browser. You're not looking to use fxml and js to build an
> > application, correct?
> > On Dec 16, 2014 5:13 AM, "Jim Laskey (Oracle)" <james.laskey at oracle.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:30 PM, Jeff Martin <jeff at reportmill.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > It seems like a couple years ago I even heard talk about making a
> >> >
> >> > jeff
More information about the openjfx-dev