8u40 is released / SB
swpalmer at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 12:20:05 UTC 2015
I would never consider for a second coding FXML "directly". I have only tweaked it by hand occasionally after creating it with SceneBuilder. SB is an important selling point for JavaFX and should be included in the JDK, it shouldn't even be a separate download.
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 3:19 AM, Tom Eugelink <tbee at tbee.org> wrote:
> My two cents would be that maintaining a UI builder is an awful lot of work, while I expect that a lot of programmers won't be using SB because it always has limitations. Either with complex layouts or custom controls. "Real" programmers probably use FXML directly or even just code it in Java. So the "return on investment" probably is fairly low and thus the resources can be much better spent on the core. IMHO.
>> On 5-3-2015 02:34, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> I agree that SB is probably something that can be well maintained by the
>> community at this point, especially with commercial backing from Gluon
More information about the openjfx-dev