[9] Review request: JDK-8170979: Update for Jigsaw etc. the openFX functional tests

Yuri Nesterenko yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com
Thu Dec 29 13:38:24 UTC 2016

And again:

(Discussion in the bug)
Unfortunately, webrev doesn't process properly
files deleted by 'hg rm' .


On 12/22/2016 12:07 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
> A new version is here:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8170979/webrev.01
> (trailing spaces removed).
> See also discussion in the bug report:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170979
> thank you, Kevin!
> -yan
> On 12/21/2016 12:19 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>> A gentle reminder.
>> Without this change, we have to make All Test Run out of
>> the makeshift workspace.
>> Thanks,
>> -yan
>> On 12/09/2016 02:02 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>>> Colleagues,
>>> please review this test bug fix:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8170979/webrev.00/
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170979
>>> The changes are mostly in tests/functional/.
>>> This is a merge of current testbase in
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/tests and whatever
>>> we have internally. The tests should now compile and work
>>> with Jigsaw (including b148, --add-opens), recognize already
>>> not too new JDK directory structure, do not use Builders etc.
>>> Small number of tests was excluded and even dropped for various
>>> reasons.
>>> Several suites were tested with b142-b146 and PIT build for
>>> the recent Jigsaw update (re: --add-opens).
>>> There are still some reservations and unanswered questions.
>>> For instance, a hard monotonous work of creation and maintaining
>>> of the so called golden images is up to a tester: I don't know a
>>> good place to share them between independent teams.
>>> A couple of the suites still won't start without a minor
>>> reconfiguration beforehand, not always properly documented.
>>> We intend to use this state of the tests for the next massive test run
>>> starting from jdk9 b150.

More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list