JDK-8198795: Remove IDE specific files from the source code repository
tom.schindl at bestsolution.at
Wed Apr 18 21:31:33 UTC 2018
Well until someone proofs that those setups can be generated I think
should maintain them.
My current Eclipse-Setup changes can been seen at . The compile error
I still see are:
* base: because of jul (i fixed that in my module-info.java) with
"requires static java.logging;"
- Dialog: see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=532850
- jul with "requires static java.logging;" in module-info.java
- adding "requires static javafx.controls;" to compile Junit
- adding "requires static java.management;" to compile
On 18.04.18 15:39, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> Iv'e been using the same setup. We first need to
> fix https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195974. Iv'e addressed a
> comment there to you.
> Then we can discuss and compare files, but I'm not clear on whether they
> should be committed.
> - Nir
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Tom Schindl
> <tom.schindl at bestsolution.at <mailto:tom.schindl at bestsolution.at>> wrote:
> I've also worked on the Eclipse specific files. We should compare yours
> and mine (I've been doing this on Photon-builds against JDK-10).
> On 18.04.18 12:29, Nir Lisker wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > There were several discussion in GitHub about removing IDE files
> (they are
> > linked from the JBS issue ). At the end, I didn't see any
> decision or
> > any change.
> > I would like to update the Eclipse files soon since the cleanup  is
> > almost done. These files allow anyone who checks out OpenJFX to start
> > working immediately. If these files are not provided, they would
> need to
> > manually configure them and currently that's a bit tricky.
> > I would like to know the current stand on this.
> > Thanks,
> > Nir
> >  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795
> >  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195798
More information about the openjfx-dev