OpenJFX 11 is in Rampdown Phase Two (RDP2)
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Thu Aug 23 15:21:47 UTC 2018
We are nearing the end of RDP2 for OpenJFX 11. As a reminder, the
deadline for getting fixes in prior to the GA Candidate (Release
Candidate) build is this coming Monday, August 27 at 11:59 pm Pacific.
After that point, only stopper issues will be considered for inclusion
On 8/7/2018 3:31 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> To: OpenJFX Developers
> As a reminder, OpenJFX 11 is now in Rampdown Phase Two RDP2. 
> During RDP2, all bug fixes, except for docs and test fixes, and all
> enhancements will need explicit approval to go in. Note that these
> restrictions apply to the soon-to-be-created openjfx/11-dev/rt repo .
> Starting now, the jfx-dev/rt mainline -- and by extension, the develop
> branch of the GitHub sandbox -- is open for openjfx12 fixes.
> We will use the same rules for RDP2 that the JDK uses , with three
> 1. Approval is needed from one of the OpenJFX project leads (not the
> OpenJDK project lead)
> 2. Since we are not part of the JDK, we need to use labels that do not
> collide with the JDK 11 release. As an obvious choice, derived from
> the JBS fix version, we will use "openjfx11-fix-request",
> "openjfx11-fix-yes", "openjfx11-fix-no" and "openjfx11-fix-nmi",
> "openjfx11-enhancement-request", "openjfx11-enhancement-yes",
> "openjfx11-enhancement-no" and "openjfx11-enhancement-nmi" as
> corresponding labels.
> 3. Some important P3 bugs might be considered during RDP2, as long as
> those bugs have otherwise met the usual code review criteria. Having
> said that, most P3 bugs should be moved to openjfx12 at this point. I
> do not expect many P3 bugs to be approved.
> If a fix is approved to push to 11-dev (with the appropriate approval
> label added by a lead), then you need not also push it to jfx-dev --
> we will auto-sync from 11-dev --> jfx-dev for the duration of the
> openjfx11 release.
> Now that we are in RDP2, the goal should be to stabilize what is
> there, with priority on fixing bugs that are new in openjfx11. We need
> to be extremely careful about including anything that introduces risk.
> Let me know if there are any questions.
> -- Kevin
>  http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/11-dev/rt (not yet created as
> of this writing)
>  http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/3
More information about the openjfx-dev