future content of OpenJFX

John-Val Rose johnvalrose at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 11:04:48 UTC 2018

Yes - I agree.  WASM would be great.

And I believe the folks at JPro are working on just that...

> On 6 Feb 2018, at 22:01, Stephen Desofi <sdesofi at icloud.com> wrote:
> Another one high on my list would be browser support via WebAssembly.    Access to the DOM would be secondary, or not important at all.  If we had the ability to draw then we don’t need the DOM.   IMHO.
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 4:00 AM, Paul Ray Russell <paulrussell70 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>> * more alignment with mobile
>> * a clean and lean low-level rendering pipeline API that would allow easier
>> plugability with upcoming low-level rendering systems
>> I would like to add a higher level desire
>> * a consensus that JavaFX will continue to open itself more to integration.
>> It has a rumour for being closed to integration. I recall the folks at JOGL
>> concluded this when they tried to integrate, but mostly, I have in mind the
>> might of JMagick, which could be easily integrated to provide all the image
>> manipulation that JavaFX so lacks currently.
>> Perhaps a forum poll would ease a vote?

More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list