Request for permission to backport fixes to jfx-11
johan.vos at gluonhq.com
Tue Oct 22 11:47:48 UTC 2019
I'm ok with the backport, as long as the patch applies clean -- which it
most likely does, as I don't think we have other changes in that file.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:15 PM Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>
> > JDK-8193502
> Johan can comment on whether he wants to backport it. As noted below,
> someone reported a regression associated with it when using gtk2, but we
> don't have a bug filed or a test case.
> > It might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073.
> Not sure what you mean since JDK-8179073 is still an open bug and thus is
> not a solved issue (although it might be worth re-testing after the fix for
> -- Kevin
> On 10/21/2019 1:08 PM, Sverre Moe wrote:
> Could JavaFX 11 also get backported the fix related for JDK-8193502? It
> might have been solved in the fix for JDK-8179073.
> I noticed this regression right after JDK 9 build 161. Recently also
> JavaFX 8 got this regression after update 181.
> It seems this was fixed in JavaFX 13.
> I asked on GitHub in #222 a while back if this could be backported.
> Considering that repository is now closed, I will repeat it here.
> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> > That's a good question for @johanvos -- it seems this might be a good
> candidate for backport, although there is one report of a possible
> regression caused by this fix when using GTK 2 as reported in #475
>  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193502
>  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179073
>  https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/456
>  https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/issues/222
> man. 21. okt. 2019 kl. 14:39 skrev Kevin Rushforth <
> kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>:
>> -- Kevin
>> On 10/21/2019 3:16 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
>> > Hi Kevin,
>> > I request permission to backport the following issues to the jfx-11
>> > repository. All patches apply clean or with minor changes (e.g.
>> > build.properties must keep jfx.release.major.version to 11)
>> > Thanks,
>> > - Johan
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221302 : Upgrade to gcc 8.2
>> > Linux
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221299 : Upgrade to Visual
>> > 2017 version 15.9.6
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221300 : Upgrade to Xcode
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214716 : Record the versions
>> > tools used to build FX in the repo
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222788 : javafx.web build
>> > on XCode 10.2
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225203 : Update SQLite to
>> > 3.28.0
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219362 : Update to 608.1
>> > of WebKit
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227079 : Cherry pick GTK
>> > 2.24.3 changes
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8230361 : [web] Cookies are
>> > enabled in WebKit v608.1
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229328 : [windows]
>> > PlatformFileHandle type should be JGObject rather than void *
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227431 : [Windows] Fix
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222912 : Websocket client
>> > work in WebView
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8226537 : Multi-level
>> > Stage::initOwner can crash gnome-shell or X.org server
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212060 : [GTK3] Stage
>> > shown at top-left before moving to correct position
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211302 : DragAndDrop no
>> > works with GTK3
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213510 : MediaPlayer does not
>> > play some mp3 with artwork stream in mjpeg
>> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207942: Add new protected
>> > VirtualFlow methods for subclassing
More information about the openjfx-dev