Proposed IntegerSpinner buggy behavior correction - JDK-8242553

Jeanette Winzenburg fastegal at
Tue Apr 14 14:31:45 UTC 2020

Hi Ajit,

thought the doc was simply bad (in specifying the behavior for  
amountPerStep = 1 and not thinking of larger amounts) - my expection  
is a calculated wrap, that is the target as you suggest via modulo the  
difference from current value. Don't know if anybody took the doc  
literally ..

-- Jeanette

Zitat von Ajit Ghaisas <ajit.ghaisas at>:

> Hi,
>    Once I fix JDK-8193286, I would like to take up JDK-8242553  
> (IntegerSpinner does not wrap around values correctly if  
> amountToStepBy is larger than total numbers between Max and Min)
>    The current implementation is not as per what is documented.
>    Refer :  
>    I propose to fix the current buggy behavior of IntegerSpinner.
>    Although it is a corner case, I would like to know if anybody  
> relies on this buggy behavior?
> Regards,
> Ajit

More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list