"Internal review ID : 9062887" (Re: FXMLLoader: not supplying filename to script engine, not supplying event object as argument to script

Rony G. Flatscher Rony.Flatscher at wu.ac.at
Sat Jan 25 14:32:27 UTC 2020

Hi Kevin,

On 24.01.2020 16:50, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> This bug was transferred to the JDK project on 28-Nov-2019. I don't know why you didn't get an
> email at that time, but I will inquire of the team who processes incoming bugs.
> Also, I'll keep an eye out for the RFE you filed today, and let you know when it is transferred in
> case there is still a problem with the notification.

thank you very much!


> On 1/22/2020 9:52 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> Hi Anthony,
>> On 22.01.2020 17:07, Anthony Vanelverdinghe wrote:
>>> Your issue has been converted into a JDK issue, with your testcase attached [1].
>> Thank you *very* much for this information!
>>> Normally you should’ve received an e-mail at the time of this conversion,
>> Just searched all my e-mail folders and could not find it (looking for "FXMLLoader" in the subject
>> of e-mails as the bug title contains that word) but could not find a matching e-mail for whatever
>> reasons.
>>> but you can check this yourself by using the internal review ID as in [2]. If you’d like to
>>> contribute a fix, see [3].
>>> Kind regards, Anthony
>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234959
>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234959>
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JI-9062887
>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JI-9062887>
>>> [3] https://github.com/openjdk/jfx <https://github.com/openjdk/jfx>
>> Thank you also for these links (and I learned something new on how to check for it using the
>> internal review id with your [2], thanks a lot for this hint as well)!
>> Will go back and study all the necessary procedures (forgot a lot since reading them the last time)
>> and will try to contribute the fix in the proper way but it may take me a little while (currently
>> quite busy around here).
>> ---
>> Maybe one more question: there would be an optimization possible by compiling scripts for script
>> engines that have the javax.script.Compilable interface implemented and use the compiled version to
>> execute/evaluate the scripts (may be helpful for event handler code e.g. for onMouseMove event
>> handlers). Can the fix include such an optimization or should there be a separate discussion/RFE for
>> it beforehand? (Adding this would be trivial in the context of the fix, however the bug description
>> would not hint at such an optimization.)
>> ---rony

More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list